Thursday, January 26, 2006

FAQs on Iran

Does the London-Washington- Tel-Aviv axis have a leg to stand on , legally or morally, in its campaign to isolate Iran internationally and to deny her a nuclear programme on the grounds that it will necessarily be used to create nuclear weapons?

No.

Is Iran in breach of the Non-proliferation Treaty?

No.

Is Britain in breach of the NPT?

The announced programme for a new generation of nuclear weapons places Britain, as a signatory to the NPT, in clear breach of that agreement which obliges Britain to endeavour to phase out nuclear weapons .

Why would Iran want a nuclear programme if not to create nuclear weapons?

The same reason that we want to renew our programme viz. in order to guarantee energy supplies in an unstable world. The fact that a country already has significant supplies of oil or gas doesn’t mean they can afford to be complacent. Just look at Britain! - we had such reserves but now they’ve run out leaving us high and dry.

Is there any evidence that Iran is constructing nuclear weapons?

No. IAEA inspectors have had unrestricted access to Iran’s nuclear facilities and have found no evidence of a nuclear weapons programme.

Is Iran a threat to us?

Iran has no means to pose a serious threat to Britain.

Are we a threat to Iran?

Undoubtedly. Our ally George W. Bush has labelled Iran as “evil”. Blair has spoken of the need to “deal with “ Iran. Coalition forces are arraigned on Iran.s Western and Eastern border. We have endeavoured to encircle Iran, isolating it internationally. We are in the midst of an extraordinary campaign of demonisation of Iran reminiscent of that which preceeded the disastrous invasion of Iraq. A press release from strategic command appears to confirm insider leaks that Cheney had requested that they prepare for nuclear strikes against Iran.

Tony Blair considers Iran to be a sponsor of international terrorism and Iran has been linked to the 7th July bombings in London. Could they carry out terrorist attacks against us?

Since the Bush/Blair faction describes all its enemies as terrorists and they are making enemies faster than they can kill them, it follows that virtually anyone could be accused of carrying out terrorist attacks. Terrorist attacks are criminal acts. Rather than leaving the press to speculate about who may or may not be behind the London bombings, and since we have both police detection agencies and a criminal justice system, I recommend that Blair and co. find out by carrying out a rigorous investigation into the facts, beginning with a full inquest into the deaths of four Asians allegedly implicated.

Isn’t Iran an easy target so shouldn’t we just attack them anyway?

Iran is a proud nation of 80 million people. They we will react fiercely to any aggression against their independence and sovereignty . They are closely allied to Russia, who have provided them with state of the art missile systems, and China for whom they are increasingly important as an energy supplier.

Could an attack against Iran then lead to a global war?

Certainly, it would be a grossly irresponsible, as well as criminal , act.

Who described the idea of attacking Iran as “silly”.

Sir Alan West, head of UK naval forces.

Should Blair be impeached?

According to General Sir Michael Rose, yes. However, he is not acting alone and appears to be part of a wider circle which is using its control of our media, institutions and political parties to advance its own, utterly reckless and ruinous agenda. These people need to be exposed and suitably restrained from further mischief.

1 Comments:

Blogger Unknown said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

1:13 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home